It has taken NIH eight full years to complete their intramural study on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (or what NIH calls “ME/CFS”) and publish their paper “Deep phenotypic of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.” I take no pleasure in the fact that … Continue reading →| Thoughts About M.E.
Research Misconduct| oir.nih.gov
Submit a Hotline Complaint| Office of Inspector General | Government Oversight | U.S. Department of Healt...
This is Part 4 of a four-part article on NIH’s Effort Preference claim. Part 1 can be found here. Part 2 can be found here. Part 3 can be found here. Readers who are not intricately familiar with M…| Thoughts About M.E.
This is Part 3 of a 4-part article on NIH’s Effort Preference claim. Part 1 can be found here. Part 2 can be found here. In this Part 3, I will discuss the EEfRT as a psychological measure, NIHR…| Thoughts About M.E.
This is Part 2 of a 4-part article on NIH’s Effort Preference claim. Part 1 can be found here: In this Part 2 of my 4-part series, I am analyzing the EEfRT data to show that they do not suppo…| Thoughts About M.E.
The infamous intramural National Institutes of Health (NIH) paper on post-infectious Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), a disease affecting many millions worldwide, purports to define the ME phenotype…| Thoughts About M.E.