I don’t like getting into fights and sometimes I am concerned this keeps me from becoming a proper methods/stats person. Getting into fights about one or multiple (or all) of the following just seems to be part of the job: p values (the canonical point of contention) Bayes factors structur| The 100% CI
Content warning: half-assed philosophy of science Part I: Causal Inference I am not very keen to join the stats wars, but if I had to join, I would rally under the banner of House Cause. That is the one framework I’d champion in a (randomised controlled) trial-by-combat if necessary: Autho| The 100% CI
A provocative and timely case for how the science of genetics can help create a more just and equal society| press.princeton.edu
