The dream of a single dialect-free C++ has probably been dead for many years, anyway.| MOND←TECH MAGAZINE
Known security limitations¶| clang.llvm.org
Overview¶| clang.llvm.org
Recently, several of my colleagues at Google shared the story of how we are retrofitting spatial safety onto our monolithic C++ codebase: https://security.googleblog.com/2024/11/retrofitting-spatial-safety-to-hundreds.html I wanted to have a bit of story-time about some of the strange ways that all this came to be, at least as I remember things. There are some really interesting developments that led us here, and some important lessons to learn from that history. Do note that this is just my ...| chandlerc.blog
Posted by Alex Rebert and Max Shavrick, Security Foundations, and Kinuko Yasuda, Core Developer Attackers regularly exploit spatial mem...| Google Online Security Blog
Posted by Jeff Vander Stoep - Android team, and Alex Rebert - Security Foundations Memory safety vulnerabilities remain a pervasive threa...| Google Online Security Blog
Contents| safecpp.org
Memory safety is a property of some programming languages that prevents programmers from introducing certain types of bugs related to how memory is used. Since memory safety bugs are often security issues, memory safe languages are more secure than languages that are not memory safe. Memory safe languages include Rust, Go, C#, Java, Swift, Python, and JavaScript. Languages that are not memory safe include C, C++, and assembly. Types of Memory Safety Bugs To begin understanding memory safety b...| Prossimo
Posted by Jeffrey Vander Stoep For more than a decade, memory safety vulnerabilities have consistently represented more than 65% of vulne...| Google Online Security Blog
The proposal for a regulation on cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements, known as the Cyber Resilience Act, bolsters cybersecurity rules to ensure more secure hardware and software products.| Shaping Europe’s digital future