Sources wouldn't participate in probe of Stanford president
Stanford’s investigation into its own president did not include some allegations it was made aware of in writing. It also lost out on access to some witnesses.| The Stanford Daily
Stanford’s investigation into its own president did not include some allegations it was made aware of in writing. It also lost out on access to some witnesses.| The Stanford Daily
One of America’s premier research institutions ends an academic year with both of its top leadership positions in question, waiting on an unprecedented misconduct investigation into the University’s own president.| The Stanford Daily
An email contained additional allegations about Marc Tessier-Lavigne’s Alzheimer’s research and the 2011 internal review that former colleagues allege uncovered falsification.| The Stanford Daily
His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations.| The Stanford Daily
One editor of a journal urges President Tessier-Lavigne to step down as more allegations of image alteration in papers co-authored by the neuroscientist emerge and the investigation into his work is, according to experts, marred.| The Stanford Daily
Marc Tessier-Lavigne faces years of allegations of scientific misconduct in his research, including papers he co-authored containing images which researchers say appear “definitely photoshopped.” One of them is now under investigation by a major journal.| The Stanford Daily
Dear Stanford Community, As you know, last December a Special Committee of the University’s Board of Trustees initiated a review of allegations of misconduct related to my scientific research and papers that I authored or coauthored. I have consistently denied any allegations, including those based on anonymous and unsubstantiated sources, that I engaged in fraud or any other unethical conduct related to my research and papers. The Findings on the Issue of Research Misconduct| tessier-lavigne-lab.stanford.edu
