As California policy makers seek to address energy affordability in 2025, this report shows why rooftop solar can and has helped control rate escalation. This research stands in direct contrast to …| Economics Outside the Cube
Borenstein’s critique of our analysis acknowledges several key errors by PAO, ignores legal precedents, and uses the wrong analytic tool for the wrong purpose.| Economics Outside the Cube
The PAO generally asserted with no additional evidence that it was correct in all ways. Again, there is no supporting analysis beyond three simplistic calculations to back up the original claim.| Economics Outside the Cube
We correct the Public Advocates Office’s estimated $8.5 billion “cost shift” by updating the retail rates and solar output, setting aside self generation, accounting for saved uti…| Economics Outside the Cube