In Sterling Computers Corporation v. International Busn. Machines Corp., 2024 WL 5168014 (D. S. Dak. Dec. 19, 2024), the court addressed: (1) whether the duty to meet and confer before moving to compel extends the time for filing such a motion; and, (2) how to show that an opponent’s production is i| E-Discovery LLC
In the ancient year of 2009, Gil Greenman and James Weingarten, of Williams & Connolly LLP, wrote “Beware the Use of Absolute Language Regarding Electronically Stored Information,” 9 Digital Discovery and e-Evidence 11 (BNA Nov. 1, 2009). Their thesis was simple and correct: “All,” “any,” an| E-Discovery LLC
In a 2021 blog, I wrote that Requests for “Any and All” Documents Are Obsolete. That blog suggests alternative approaches. Recently, in Nelson v. I.Q. Data International, Inc., 2024 WL 2963790 (E.D. Mich. June 12, 2024), the court wrote: Courts have long condemned omnibus “any and all” document| E-Discovery LLC
Thanks to Sidley Austin for publishing a blog on Ravin Crossbows, LLC v. Hunter’s Manufacturing Company, Inc., 2024 WL 3253265 (E.D. Ohio July 1, 2024), August’s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery | Insights | Sidley Austin LLP (Aug. 21, 2024) and August’s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discover| E-Discovery LLC
...| Cole Schotz
The Sedona Conference has released its “Primer on Crafting eDiscovery Requests with ‘Reasonable Particularity’” (Nov. 2021, Public Comment Version). The Primer is a valuable contribution. It gathers a substantial body of research in an easy-to-read, authoritative resource. It focuses entirely o| E-Discovery LLC
