My response to Colin Koopman’s “Human-Data Coupling: Informational Personhood & Artificial Intelligence Through Gilbert Simondon’s Philosophy of Technology” (2025) begins and ends from a place of admiration, and thus I must extend my gratitude to the editors of Social Epistemology for this invitation and for the opportunity to acknowledge my debt to Koopman’s thinking in the hope of advancing it even further. … [please read below the rest of the article].| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
I have learned a great deal from Karin Kukkonen’s (2024) account of literary works as ‘boundary objects’, including her discussion of how these objects may play a role in facilitating interdisciplinary exchanges. While I find Kukkonen’s argument convincing overall, I have a few qualifications and complications that I would like to formulate in my response to “Designing an Expert-Setting for Interdisciplinary Dialogue: Literary Texts as Boundary Objects.” … [please read below the...| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
The Generalist-Particularist Distinction Does Not Need to be Replaced, it Needs to be Revised: A Response to Boudry and Napolitano, Steve Clarke| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
