I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond to Francesco Censon’s paper, “The Rejected Expert and the Knowledge’s Half-Blood” (2025). In what follows, I will discuss Censon’s concept of Knowledge’s…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Abstract| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
This paper is the fourth stage in my debate with Bálint Békefi on the pages of SERRC (for previous details see Békefi 2024; Tőzsér 2025; Békefi 2025). Although our debate originally unfolded in…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Valentine Dusek, who was a philosopher of science and technology at University New Hampshire, where he taught for 50 years, passed away in May 2025. With a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
I keep searching the sky. As if I expected to see, rather like hearts, a lost pair of kites hurry to heaven. — Truman Capote Mass suicide culture can be epistemically sound. We are not considering…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
How should the pursuit of knowledge be organized, given that under normal circumstances knowledge is pursued by many human beings, each working on a more or less well-defined body of knowledge and each equipped with roughly the same imperfect cognitive capacities, albeit with varying degree of access to one another’s activities?| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
