In a live interview today with Hunters HD Gold, Sig Sauer VP of Consumer Affairs, Phil Strader, addressed an audience question about the “highly confidential” P320 document that I previously wrote about and published here. Strader is quoted as saying, “now that it is out there, we [Sig] don’t mind.”| Practical Shooting Insights
If you’ve followed my recent research into the Sig Sauer P320 litigation, you know the headlines keep piling up. Days after we learned an Air Force airman was fatally shot while unholstering his nearly identical M18 service pistol, a federal court in Missouri handed down another piece of news: the first statewide consumer class action over the P320 is officially moving forward.| Practical Shooting Insights
This story begins with research I started a few days ago after reading about the recent, tragic incident involving a United States Air Force airman who was killed while on duty, reportedly while unholstering his Air Force-issued Sig Sauer M18. This firearm is, for all intents and purposes, identical to the consumer P320 model handgun. That incident led me to explore recent litigation against Sig Sauer through CourtListener. I discovered approximately 20–30 federal court cases involving the ...| Practical Shooting Insights
The secrecy battle over the Army’s Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) for Sig Sauer’s P320 has followed Glasscock v. Sig Sauer to the Eighth Circuit. A media intervenor is now asking the appellate court to keep key records open—and their brief places Practical Shooting Insights (this site) squarely in the middle of the story.| Practical Shooting Insights
