We don’t need a paradigm shift. We need a revolution.— Nicole Bauer| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Like Foucault, I suspect that a new anthropology, a new form of mind, a new ‘episteme’ is taking shape, as the previous understandings of the human disappear, like figures written into the sand on a beach. In the codes of modern mystical experiences, I detect a future mentality attempting contact with our own hopelessly inadequate religious and rational forms of thinking. —Jeffrey J. Kripal, “Introductory Essay,” Rice University Department of Religion.| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Abstract| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
A few years ago, I had an experience during meditation that I cannot put into words. I can try to describe it with weak metaphors and approximations, but suffice it to say, it was one of those astonishing, sublime, blow-your-doors-off experiences that mystics and many others have recounted for centuries. I had been in the middle of writing an article about proto-communist radicals who attempted to overthrow the government in late eighteenth-century France, just before Napoleon’s coup, and c...| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
There are two streams of events in the world we may call public and non-public. The first constitutes officially acknowledged, publicly certified or certifiable events and the second a rub rosa realm…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Book Review contributions are single-authored or multiple-authored reviews of recent books in the area of social epistemology.| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Articles are stand-alone contributions to SERRC.| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective