Great confusions about meaningness stem from the mistaken assumption that there must be some sort of eternal ordering principle.| Meaningness
Adding new comments is disabled for now.| meaningness.com
Adding new comments is disabled for now.| meaningness.com
Adding new comments is disabled for now.| meaningness.com
People think they approach meaning in terms of religions or philosophies, but in practice, "stances" matter more.| Meaningness
Adding new comments is disabled for now.| meaningness.com
Defining the subject matter: rationality, rationalism, reasonableness, and meta-rationality.| Meta-rationality
Nihilistic claims about subjectivity, inherent meaning, universal meaning, and scientific objectivity do not hold up.| Meaningness
Intuitions of “cosmic meaning” root in hunger for personal significance, and in encounters with vastness.| Meaningness
Meanings come and go; they are not eternally stable—and that is fine.| Meaningness
A world of total license: the catastrophe some fear if nihilistic views become widespread.| Meaningness
“Nihilism is inevitable, but not a problem.” This is mistaken: it makes you miserable and ineffective, and erodes social and cultural capacity.| Meaningness
Nihilism promises you don’t have to care, because nothing means anything. But you do care—and you can’t escape that.| Meaningness
If meaning lives only in Neverland, we can’t make much use of it. Fortunately, it’s here, now.| Meaningness
Are you adult enough to accept that the world offers no absolute guarantees?| Meaningness
Your post on the different stances mostly focused on ideation, regarding what goes on individually in relation to meaningness. I imagine that, for most of us, this cognitive process is habitual and out of awareness. That led me to think about the stances’ effect on behaviour, how that propels our flip-flopping from one to another - and how it might be a key to recognising our own underlying stances. This could be confusing: behaviours derived from a stance often appear to mean, and are r...| meaningness.com
The fallacy of Proving Too Much is when you challenge an argument because, in addition to proving its intended conclusion, it also proves obviously false conclusions. For example, if someone says &…| Slate Star Codex
