Using “headless” Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) actions as a tool for plaintiffs to avoid arbitration of their individual PAGA claims has been significantly undermined with a recent California Court of Appeal decision. In Leeper v. Shipt, Inc. (B339670, December 31, 2024), the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that her PAGA action couldn’t be compelled| HRWatchdog -
In a recent case, the California Supreme Court limited a PAGA plaintiff’s ability to intervene in another PAGA action and object to a settlement.| HRWatchdog
The California Supreme Court says the Legislature’s overall Private Attorneys’ General Act (PAGA) design exempted public entities from its PAGA penalties.| HRWatchdog