Why do Different Ways of Categorising Populism Matter? A Reply to Scanni, Andrew Reid| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Our starting point in “Universities as Anarchic Knowledge Institutions” (2024) is that research universities can appear to be inefficient organisations, in need of management reforms and strategic streamlining from outside forces. Despite appearances, we argue that this image usually holds only if we try to view research universities through the prism of some other type of organisation, like a business corporation. Historically, this is a relatively new idea: as Krücken and Meier (2006) ...| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
A few months ago, during the question and answer session of one of her talks, I had the chance to ask noted feminist philosopher of science Helen Longino her thoughts on why there is not as much…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
In his “Classical Logic and the Gender Binary” (2024), Axel Barceló replies to some of Franci Mangraviti’s claims in their “The Contribution of Logic to Epistemic Injustice” (2023b). One of Mangraviti’s central affirmations is that “logic-based epistemic injustice is in principle possible—epistemic resources have logical aspects, and there are many ways in which said aspects could end up associated with certain groups” (5). Barceló agrees that epistemic resources have logi...| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Hermeneutical injustice occurs when our epistemic environment systematically fails to provide the tools we need to make sense of our own experiences. I claim that an instance of hermeneutical…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective