If we must have AI, we should replace “neural” methods with simpler, cheaper, and safer alternatives.| Better without AI
The AI safety field often takes the central question as “when will it happen?!” That is futile: we don’t have a coherent description of what “it” is, much less how “it” would come about. Fortunately, a prediction wouldn’t be useful anyway. An AI apocalypse is possible, so we should try to avert it.| Better without AI
So-called “neural networks” are extremely expensive, poorly understood, unfixably unreliable, deceptive, data hungry, and inherently limited in capabilities.| Better without AI