The Trump administration's cuts of public health funds to state and local health departments had vastly uneven effects depending on the political leanings of where someone lives, a new KFF Health News analysis shows.| KFF Health News
The transparency of donations to the WHO Foundation -- which raises funds and gives grants to the WHO -- has sunk over its first 3 years of operations.| U.S. Right to Know
NCSL’s State-Federal team is tracking the latest states-related executive orders, policies and memoranda issued by the Trump administration.| www.ncsl.org
By Shannon Kelleher Amid a flurry of actions curtailing Biden’s environmental policies, the administration of newly inaugurated President Donald Trump this week withdrew a plan to set limits on toxic PFAS chemicals in industrial wastewater.| The New Lede
New International Health Regulations approved a year ago, will come into force in September unless your government rejects them This is an 'opt out' not an 'opt in'. Write to your Health Secretary today| HART
US withdrawal from the WHO and of all foreign aid will have dire consequences for Africa. It’s time the continent took responsibility for its own people.| The Conversation
The Trump administration has acted fast to attack science with a range of funding and policy tactics| Scientific American
Halts to external communications, publishing reports and reviewing and approving research a ‘dramatic shift’| the Guardian
Multifront conflicts have never ended well for the countries that provoked them.| Foreign Policy
President Donald Trump’s first two weeks in office come with a flurry of executive orders posing concerns for marginalized communities.| The Observer
In this blog post, we document and analyse the numerous apparent breaches of international law that have occurred within the first six weeks of the 2025 Trump administration. What began as an informal discussion at the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law has evolved into this analytical overview. We believe this documentation serves both academic purposes and potentially supports future legal proceedings. While defenders of these actions will undoubtedly offer justifications for what we ...| Verfassungsblog
For years, the Chinese Communist Party, assorted allies in the United Nations and its agencies, including notably the World Health Organization (WHO), and other globalists have sought to promote world government at the expense of national sovereignty and individual freedoms in countries like ours. U| The Sovereignty Summit
We are elated that President Trump fulfilled his campaign promise on the first day back in office to defend our national sovereignty and personal medical freedoms by withdrawing America from the corrupt and incompetent World Health Organization (WHO). This action is a first and necessary step in res| Sovereignty Coalition
Le jour de son investiture, Donald Trump a signé un décret entamant le départ des États-Unis de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé. Il dénonce une « escroquerie ». Les experts en santé publique, eux, signalent le danger de ce départ pour la santé mondiale et celle des Américains. Lors de son investiture, lundi 20| Numerama
L’Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità perde il suo più importante finanziatore, cambia la Sanità globale.| Senti Chi Parla
The new president has signed more than 100 directives that will alter the course of US policy. We look at how they will influence free expression in the “land of liberty”| Index on Censorship
Executive orders reject trans people, refugees, foreign aid and the World Health Organization.| Erasing 76 Crimes