Dilan Gohill won an award for his work at the Stanford Daily, but his coverage of campus protests has set university officials against him.| Columbia Journalism Review
Stanford’s investigation into its own president did not include some allegations it was made aware of in writing. It also lost out on access to some witnesses.| The Stanford Daily
One of America’s premier research institutions ends an academic year with both of its top leadership positions in question, waiting on an unprecedented misconduct investigation into the University’s own president.| The Stanford Daily
President Tessier-Lavigne rejected Daily’s allegations, saying, “the first publication is almost never the final word.” The Faculty Senate also discussed the topic of graduate affordability concerns and upcoming accreditation.| The Stanford Daily
“This story is evolving in ways that make me question my decision to come to Stanford and SLAC to conduct my research in the first place.” Researchers criticized the special committee appointed by the Board of Trustees for lack of transparency and the committee released a statement.| The Stanford Daily
The allegations involving the Stanford president and other recent cases herald a public arrival for the awareness of image manipulation as a serious problem in science.| STAT
Three more papers have been identified as containing alleged image manipulation since The Daily’s first article. Stanford announced that former U.S. Attorney Carol Lam would lead its investigation, upsetting scientists who criticized the University for investigating itself rather than calling on a third party.| The Stanford Daily
An email contained additional allegations about Marc Tessier-Lavigne’s Alzheimer’s research and the 2011 internal review that former colleagues allege uncovered falsification.| The Stanford Daily
His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations.| The Stanford Daily
One editor of a journal urges President Tessier-Lavigne to step down as more allegations of image alteration in papers co-authored by the neuroscientist emerge and the investigation into his work is, according to experts, marred.| The Stanford Daily
Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne will resign effective Aug. 31. He will also retract or issue lengthy corrections to five widely cited papers for which he was principal author after a Stanford-sponsored investigation found “manipulation of research data.”| The Stanford Daily
