Algebraic effects are not just a research concept anymore. You can use them in real software, today. Here's why you'd want to do that, in order of importance.| www.relax.software
Musings about async await again and why I think virtual threads| Armin Ronacher's Thoughts and Writings
Making payments simpler and more reliable by removing databases out of the way.| news.alvaroduran.com
A follow-up to how I wish async would work.| Armin Ronacher's Thoughts and Writings
本文永久链接 - https://tonybai.com/2024/01/07/what-we-got-right-what-we-got-wrong 在《2023年Go语言盘点:稳中求新,稳中求变》和《Go测试的20个实用建议》两篇文章中,我都提到过已经退居二线的Go语言之父R| tonybai.com
Today, we're going to discuss .NET locks API, how are they (un)fit for the async workflows and thread-pool backed runtimes and what can we do about it. We'll also challenge some of the decades old design decisions and propose a new ones. Finally we're going to implement a working| Bartosz Sypytkowski
tl;dr Java has virtual threads. Virtual threads are a better way of doing concurrency than Python’s async and await. We should add virtual threads to Python. Virtual Threads Virtual threads were added to Java a few years ago. Virtual Threads combine the best of async Tasks and normal threads. Like normal threads, virtual threads: require no new syntax provide a more intuitive mode of execution than async/await. Like tasks, virtual threads: only switch execution at well defined points in ...| Discussions on Python.org
What Color is Your Function?| journal.stuffwithstuff.com
TLDR: I think that the primary benefit of async/await is that it lets us concisely express complex concurrency; any (potential) performance improvements are just a second-order effect. We should thus judge async primarily based on how it simplifies our code, not how (or if) it makes the code faster.| Kobzol’s blog
Unix daemons are programs which run in the background, performing tasks on our| tratt.net
Want to follow along with Rust development? Curious how you might get involved? Take a look!| blog.rust-lang.org