This post is a follow-up to my previous essay on reducing suffering given long-term cluelessness. Long-term cluelessness is the idea that we have no clue which actions are likely to create better o…| Magnus Vinding
An objection against trying to reduce suffering is that we cannot predict whether our actions will reduce or increase suffering in the long term. Relatedly, some have argued that we are clueless about the effects that any realistic action would have on total welfare, and this cluelessness, it has been claimed, undermines our reason to help others in effective ways. For example, DiGiovanni (2025) writes: “if my arguments [about cluelessness] hold up, our reason to work on EA causes is underm...| Magnus Vinding
By Simon Knutsson Version from April 15, 2024, posted online April 19, 2024, addition made to acknowledgements June 15, 2024 Draft Comments are very welcome to simonknutsson@gmail.com Summary Readers might have heard a story about population ethics that goes something…| Simon Knutsson