Toby Shu explains the impact of the Loper Bright Supreme Court decision, which relates to scientific expertise in government.| Fancy Comma, LLC
Shapiro and Tomain’s new book highlights political and economic constraints on the incoming Trump Administration's ability to achieve its goals.| The Regulatory Review
The April posting in the Federal Register by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was a bombshell. The feds are proposing to eliminate the regulatory Endangered Species Act’s definition of “harm.” Full stop. The ESA declares that it is illegal to “take” any member of a protected species […]| Investigate Midwest
National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services| Justia Law
David Kinyua Mwongera, Petitioner, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Respondent, 187 F.3d 323 (3d Cir. 1999) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit| Justia Law
On November 15, 2024, District Judge Sean D. Jordan issued an order vacating and setting aside the DOL's April 2024 rules that increased the salary thresholds| ELH / HR4Sight
Battles for political responsiveness and proceduralism have undermined government’s ability to get things done.| www.persuasion.community
Welcome to hell, SCOTUS.| Vox
One of the Court’s most significant decisions of 2024 was Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. In a reversal of 40 years of precedent, courts—not agencies—will have the last word on interpreting| Ms. Magazine
by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer Legal pundits are predicting the imminent demise (or at least substantial enfeeblement) of the Chevron doctrine. Until recently, that case afforded substantial judicial deference to decisions made by administrative agencies if a statutory provision under its purview was ambiguous. Now two cases are before the Supreme Court challenging an agency interpretation| Bill of Health - The blog of the Petrie-Flom Center at Harvard Law School