Legislators in four states—Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, and Vermont—have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure. This post outlines the likely contours of these lawsuits, and the features of the Climate Superfund bills that may make them vulnerable to, or resilient against, such challenges.| Climate Law Blog
With President-Elect Trump's new plans, taxpayers may face significant changes and uncertainties. With phased reductions in Bonus Depreciation, potential new tariffs, and adjustments in international tax policy, both businesses and individuals must stay informed to adapt their tax strategies in this| Johanson Group, LLP
This article was updated on June 28 at 3:46 p.m. In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. The decision will likely have far-| SCOTUSblog
Ruling shifts balance of power to judicial branch| Earthjustice
This past month has seen some big news in the policy world, with important connections to all of our work.| Winter Wildlands Alliance
Thomas has attended at least two Koch donor summits, putting him in the extraordinary position of having helped a political network that has brought multiple cases before the Supreme Court.| ProPublica
Data Dispute: Users Caught In Crossfire Between MongoDB, Synapse Trustee; SoLo Funds Settles with PA; Loper & Corner Post Decisions Drop| fintechbusinessweekly.substack.com
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a North Dakota truck stop can bring a challenge to a regulation issued 13 years ago by the Federal Reserve Board. In a 6-3 vote divided along ideological lines, the justices significantly expanded plaintiffs’ ability to sue federal regulators, ruling that the statute of limitations to challenge an... Read More| Amy Howe
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a North Dakota truck stop can bring a challenge to a regulation issued 13 years ago by the Federal Reserve Board. In a 6-3 vote divided along ideological lines, the justices significantly expanded plaintiffs’ ability to sue federal regulators, ruling that the s| SCOTUSblog
Heavy-handed Internet regulation is back . . . for some reason. But don’t expect it to last.| corbinkbarthold.substack.com