An Open Challenge to Virologists - by Mike Stone
A Response to Ed Rybicki| mikestone.substack.com
The germ “theory:" a scientific foundation or a logical fallacy?| mikestone.substack.com
The germ “theory:” a scientific foundation or a logical fallacy? To those familiar with my work, it comes as no surprise that I take great interest in highlighting the forgotten voices from t…| ViroLIEgy
How a speculative agent with no direct evidence was framed as a causative "virus."| mikestone.substack.com
How a speculative agent with no direct evidence was framed as a causative “virus.” In the 1950s, virology began to emerge as a distinct discipline, separating itself from bacteriology. …| ViroLIEgy
Version 2.0 When I first set out to create ViroLIEgy.com, my goal—beyond providing a place to share and preserve my research—was to build a one-stop site where people could easily access infor…| ViroLIEgy
The absolutely necessary scientific evidence required. When engaging with those who defend the germ “theory” of disease and virology, I often ask them for the necessary logical and scientific evide…| ViroLIEgy
The flawed reasoning ingrained within the foundations of virology has infected the minds of those who consider themselves rational thinkers. ViroLIEgy 101 is a series of articles meant to prov…| ViroLIEgy
Quack: 1) A practitioner who suggests the use of substances or devices for the prevention or treatment of disease that are known to be ineffective. 2) A person who pretends to be able to diagn…| ViroLIEgy
Senseless: unconscious; foolish, stupid; meaningless...take your pick. They may all be apt descriptors of this Strand.| mikestone.substack.com
My recent exchanges with defenders of virology and germ theory on Twitter have really opened my eyes as to how entrenched the indoctrination has become and how critical thinking skills and logic ha…| ViroLIEgy
