Last year we published an article about the calculation of free cash flow and the alternative approaches used by Amazon. That original article is still very relevant; recent accounting changes have prompted us to publish an update. New accounting rules effective in 2019 change and improve the data available to you under both IFRS and US GAAP when making the adjustments we advocate. We explain these changes, provide updated free cash flow measures for Amazon, based upon their 2019 financial st...| The Footnotes Analyst
Stock-based compensation can be difficult. Two approaches to measurement, valuation uncertainty, frequent adjustments for changes in estimates (including sometimes the stock price), and a dilutive effect in addition to an expense, all contribute this being a topic many investors try their best to avoid. Investors are not helped by inadequate stock-based compensation disclosures. Some companies go further than required by accounting standards, such as Swiss bank UBS, whose helpful additional a...| The Footnotes Analyst
Amazon provides investors with three alternative calculations of a free cash flow metric. For 2018 these range from $8.4bn to $19.4bn. In contrast our preferred approach gives a negative free cash flow of $3.4bn. What explains these material differences? The disclosures by Amazon about its free cash flow measures are good and the calculations go further than many other companies. However, in our view important components are missing. We explain our additional adjustments in respect of leased ...| The Footnotes Analyst
Considering the market’s focus on earnings, other comprehensive income (OCI) can be easily overlooked by investors. We think OCI is always important in equity analysis, but if you use a residual income approach to valuation the requirement for a ‘clean surplus’ in your model makes it vital to consider gains and losses reported outside profit and loss. We explain clean surplus accounting and why residual income valuations only work if your forecast financial statements meet the clean sur...| The Footnotes Analyst
Discounted cash flow and similar valuation methods are often cited as the only way to derive an intrinsic value of an equity investment that does not depend on how other assets are priced by the market. In contrast, valuation multiples, such as a price earnings ratio or EV/EBITDA, merely identify value relative to other assets. However, this view is not only simplistic - both DCF and valuation multiples can be used in a so-called absolute and relative sense – but it can also be incorrect....| The Footnotes Analyst
Defined benefit pension schemes create two leverage effects - financial leverage due to the debt like nature of pension deficits and asset allocation leverage if pension assets are not matched with pension liabilities. In DCF valuation these effects must be correctly, and consistently, included in both the discount rate and free cash flow. We use an interactive model to demonstrate four possible DCF approaches based on enterprise and equity cash flows. Our preferred approach is based on enter...| The Footnotes Analyst
One of the errors we encounter when reviewing DCF models concerns valuation date and cashflow timing adjustments. Although the effect may not always be that material, getting these adjustments wrong undermines the credibility of DCF valuations. We explain the correct application of valuation date adjustments, the necessary amounts for the enterprise to equity bridge, and how to roll-forward values to derive 12-month price targets. We also provide a downloadable model to illustrate these diffe...| The Footnotes Analyst
Convertible bond issuance is at a record high, with companies ‘benefiting’ from low interest rates and high equity volatility. However, convertibles are not the cheap form of financing that is sometimes claimed, nor do we think that so-called ‘hedging’ transactions, which often accompany convertible issues, create value for investors.| The Footnotes Analyst
Reported operating cash flow, leverage and net working capital measures, may be misleading if a company engages in supply chain financing. The impact can be significant but, at present, calculating the effect and making adjustments is difficult. Additional IFRS disclosures proposed by the IASB will help. We explain the new disclosures and provide an interactive model to illustrate how to use them to calculate more realistic measures of cash flow, leverage and working capital. The adjustments ...| The Footnotes Analyst
The problem with cash flow statements is that ... they only include cash flows. This may seem odd, given that the purpose of cash flow statements is simply to report cash movements. However, most cash flow analysis is focused on sub-totals and it is here that offsetting flows arising from non-cash transactions become important. We explain why adjustments are required and for which transactions you should adjust.| The Footnotes Analyst
Valuation methods based on enterprise value have become the benchmark in equity valuation. Most of you will have analysed equity investments using valuation multiples based on a market enterprise value or have applied absolute valuation methods to derive a target enterprise value. In simplistic terms enterprise value is market capitalisation plus net debt; but is that good enough? In many situations we think not. We review the key building blocks of enterprise value to assist you in deriving ...| The Footnotes Analyst
If DCF terminal values are based on continuing forecast cash flow, it is important that the reinvestment assumption is consistent with long-term return expectations. We provide an interactive DCF model that demonstrates four alternative cash flow growth-based terminal value calculations, along with related returns analysis. One of the challenges when using returns in equity valuation is the limited recognition of intangible assets. Adjustments to capitalise intangible investment do not change...| The Footnotes Analyst
There is usually at least one metric that gives valuation-based support for an investment, even if this is contradicted by other indicators of relative or absolute value. You may have heard comments such as “… but it looks cheap on EV/EBITDA” to help justify a particular investment recommendation. We examine why different multiples can give conflicting indications of relative value. For example, food-on-the-go stock Greggs trades at a 35% discount to rival Dominos Pizza, based on EV/EBI...| The Footnotes Analyst
A largely cost-based measurement approach in financial reporting generally provides sufficient information about operating ‘flows’ to enable investors to apply enterprise value based DCF (or DCF proxy) valuation models. However, fair values are crucial for the ‘bridge’ from enterprise to equity value. Fair values are available for many, but not all, of the assets, liabilities and equity claims that should be included in the enterprise to equity bridge. We explain the limitations of cu...| The Footnotes Analyst
A forecast of profit is used for both valuation multiples and as a starting point in deriving free cash flow for DCF valuations. But should you use a forecast of the reported IFRS or GAAP measure, or a forecast of the adjusted non-IFRS or non-GAAP alternative performance measure (APM) presented by management? We think equity valuations should be based on forecasts of reported IFRS or GAAP earnings (albeit with some adjustment related to intangible assets). Forecasts of management APMs can b...| The Footnotes Analyst
Although we generally prefer an enterprise value based approach, earnings and price earnings ratios remain an important and legitimate component of equity analysis and valuation. Earnings based analysis includes the earnings per share enhancement or dilutive effects of major transactions. We discuss the value relevance of earnings enhancement or dilution arising from new capital bring raised and invested, with a focus on rights issues. In an earnings-based approach to analysis, it is importan...| The Footnotes Analyst
It can be observed that higher financial leverage increases equity beta. However, the relationship between the unleveraged asset or enterprise beta (the beta of the underlying operating business), and leveraged equity beta that is commonly applied in practice, is incomplete. We explain the relevance of asset betas in equity valuation and why it is important to analyse the beta of debt finance and the value, and riskiness, of the debt interest tax shield when delevering and relevering equity b...| The Footnotes Analyst
The fact that the cost of debt finance is tax deductible, whereas the cost of equity is not, seems to give a structural advantage to debt finance. The value (if any) of this ‘tax shield’ is either an explicit or more likely implicit component of any equity valuation. The most commonly quoted calculation of the value of the debt interest tax shield understates value by ignoring growth but overstates value by ignoring the effect of personal taxes. We explain how to incorporate these often-i...| The Footnotes Analyst
The underlying rationale and conceptual basis for the equity method of accounting for investments in associates is unclear. Equity accounting can be regarded as either the cost-based measurement of an investment or as a quasi (one-line) form of consolidation – but neither is particularly helpful for investors. We explain the limitations of the equity method and advocate measuring all investments in associates at fair value, consistent with other minority equity holdings. This results in a m...| The Footnotes Analyst
Equity beta is a valid measure of investment risk and an important metric in equity analysis. However, don’t just plug into your models the equity beta given by a data provider - beta should be analysed and adjusted by investors with the same diligence that is applied to performance metrics. We present an interactive equity beta analysis model to assist investors in better understanding the drivers of equity beta and its application in equity valuation. The model features the calculation of...| The Footnotes Analyst
Residual income based valuations are a useful alternative to the more common discounted cash flow. While both approaches must produce the same answer for a given set of assumptions and value drivers, we think it can be easier to derive realistic inputs using the residual income approach, considering the focus on return on investment. However, residual income also poses challenges. The approach requires ‘clean surplus’ accounting, return inputs must allow for accounting distortions due to ...| The Footnotes Analyst
