I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond to Francesco Censon’s paper, “The Rejected Expert and the Knowledge’s Half-Blood” (2025). In what follows, I will discuss Censon’s concept of Knowledge’s…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
On encountering Charles Lassiter’s article (2024a) “Reading the Signs: From Dyadic to Triadic Views for Identifying Experts,” I felt totally in tune with his vision. A few years ago, I too had published an article in the Italian journal Prometeo on the crisis of competence (Censon 2020) which, although it did not have the theoretical breadth of the one written by Lassiter, touched on the same points. … [please read below the rest of the article].| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Volume 13, Issue 5, 1–73, May 2024 ❧ Špelda, Petr, Vit Stritecky, John Symons. “On the Need for Multiple, Independent Fact-Checking and Scoring Facilities: A Reply to Schurz.| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
