Gibson Dunn’s U.S. Supreme Court Round-Up provides an overview of cases being argued during the October 2025 Term and highlights other key developments on the Court’s docket. The post U.S. Supreme Court Round-Up (October 2025) appeared first on Gibson Dunn.| Gibson Dunn
Never say never. Maybe someday the Court will surprise us with a big win for the environment. But it would be foolish to count on that. We can also hope that the Court will do other good things, such as reining in Trump’s executive overreach. But it would be foolish to count on the Court to take a stand in favor of environmental protection.| Legal Planet
Based on the facts as set forth by the D.C. Circuit, its decision in the Tennessee Pipeline case may have been right. But the opinion went astray with its unrestrained enthusiasm for deference in NEPA cases, and its assumption that the same rules carry over in reviewing decisions under other statutes like the Natural Gas Act.| Legal Planet
Scholar argues that an ideal information platform regulator must be adaptable, informed, and multidisciplinary. The post Evaluating the FTC as a Potential Information Platform Regulator first appeared on The Regulatory Review.| The Regulatory Review
The program focused on recruiting and retaining underrepresented students to pursue graduate degrees through the USD Division of Biomedical and Translational Science.| Sioux Falls Live
Kenyatta’s bill would redefine marriage as a civil contract between two adults.| Stu Bykofsky
The US Supreme Court will hear arguments on Monday on if it's lawful for local governments to criminalize sleeping outside when shelter space is insufficient, potentially impacting urban policies on homeless encampments.| www.kqed.org
WASHINGTON (AP) — A sharply divided Supreme Court upheld President Donald Trump's ban on travel from several mostly Muslim countries Tuesday, the conservative majority taking his side in a major ruling supporting his presidential power.| AP News
(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump said Tuesday that his administration will ask the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to quickly take up his appeal on tariff authority after two lower courts rejected his claims of broad authority to issue import duties under a 1977 law. “It’s a very important decision and frankly, if they make the wrong decision, … Read more| The Heartlander
Aug. 19, 2025 (DENVER) – For centuries, states have regulated professional health care to protect patients from substandard care. Throughout that time, the First Amendment has never barred states’ ability to prohibit substandard care, regardless of whether it is carried […] The post Attorney General Phil Weiser urges U.S. Supreme Court to uphold laws protecting kids and families from dangerous, discredited mental health care practices appeared first on Colorado Attorney General.| Colorado Attorney General
Two recent Supreme Court decisions identify in which court EPA decisions can be challenged.| The Regulatory Review
Scholars discuss regulating to help ensure accountability for police misconduct.| The Regulatory Review
The Supreme Court’s refusal to strengthen protections for veterans will have a lasting impact.| The Regulatory Review
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a GOP-backed challenge to a decades-old campaign finance law that limits how much parties can spend in coordination with candidates for federal office.| Wisconsin Watch
Two recent Supreme Court decisions present conflicting perspectives on “ghost guns.”| The Regulatory Review
Having access to necessary care with trained professionals is lifesaving for young transgender people. When a person’s gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth, they can experience many symptoms, including depression and anxiety, until they have affirming resources and are allowed to live their life as their true self. For many […] The post By Refusing to Provide Necessary Care to Trans Youth Under 19 Years of Age, Penn State Health and UPMC Are Failing Their Patie...| Publiquemoslo
Mike Fox of the Cato Institute has argued that ICE's detention and border enforcement practices, enabled by Supreme Court decisions, violate individual privacy rights and expand government power in ways the Constitution's framers sought to prevent.| Davis Vanguard
WASHINGTON — The administration of President Donald Trump has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to end the legal status of more than 500,000| Verdaily
The far-right among American conservatives has a new gripe to air: Women should not be allowed to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.| Baptist News Global
On Monday, Virginia filed an emergency stay asking the Supreme Court to block a federal court’s order for the state to add 1,600 people back to the voter rolls. The removals stemmed from an executive order by Gov. Glenn Youngkin, and are at the center of two lawsuits the state is facing from voter rights […]| Virginia Mercury
Researchers whose studies were used to argue for restrictions on medication abortion are suing academic publisher Sage| Georgia Recorder
If you sensed that hacking and ransomware attacks spiked during the pandemic, your suspicions were accurate. A perfect storm of lapses in security, a rise in scripted attacks, and increased professionalized hacking have led to some of the most debilitating and embarrassing cyber attacks to date. The high-profile Colonial Pipeline debacle led to gasoline hoarding,...| Legal Talk Network
Coal advocates offer troubling new grounds for the Supreme Court to stay EPA’s carbon pollution standards.| Legal Planet
From the column: "The most crucial part of the case is that the platforms are no different from newspapers, the archetypal bearers of free-press and free-speech rights."| Duluth News Tribune
Loper Bright significantly expands the power of the Supreme Court at the expense of democratic institutions of government.| The Regulatory Review
The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned a case that, for nearly four decades, mandated that courts defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of the statutes they oversee.| CalChamber Alert
When the Supreme Court overruled Chevron, what did the Court put in its place? Is the change that earthshaking or is it just a course-correction.| Legal Planet
