This case involves surreptitiously created NCP videos from a college locker room. (Note: this is not a new issue for Section 230–the Doe v. GTE 7th Circuit decision dealt with similar facts in 2003). Murphy allegedly set up the cameras.... The post Section 230 Applies to Surreptitiously Recorded Video–Does 1-9 v. Pornhub and xHamster appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Rep. Jeremy Faison is a Republican Tennessee state representative in what is a hugely Republican district (for example, his district includes Cocke County, which voted 83% for Trump in 2024). He also is the chamber’s Republican Caucus Chairman. He came... The post Court Greenlights Politician’s Censorship of Social Media Comments–Fox v. Faison appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Krasno is a critic of University of Wisconsin-Madison’s treatment of animals. She commented on UWM’s Instagram and Facebook posts. UWM’s social media managers hid her comments manually; some of her comments were blocked by UWM’s keyword filters. Prior blog post....| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
I’m trying to clear my blogging queue that backlogged during my China trip. Here are three Section 230 decisions from the last few weeks. Geegieh v. Unknown Parties, 2025 WL 1769766 (D. Ariz. June 26, 2025) The plaintiff claims that...| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
The D.C. Circuit held that Congress’ TikTok ban survived a variety of Constitutional challenges, including a First Amendment challenge, even if strict scrutiny applies. The decision will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, with uncertain prospects, so this is...| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
More Bitcoin litigation 🙄. This time, malefactors hijacked popular YouTube channels and uploaded videos promoting Bitcoin scams: First, scammers will breach YouTube’s security to unlawfully gain access to verified and popular YouTube channels with tens or hundreds of thousands of...| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Spencer’s wife had an extra-marital affair with Doe. Doe sent “photographs and screen shots of sexually explicit images” to the wife. Spencer, the husband, came into possession of these materials via unspecified means. He assembled various collages of the images...| Technology & Marketing Law Blog
