Let me begin by thanking Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier for his insightful discussion (2025), which has helped me think through this material more carefully and explore ways to extend it. In the following, I will first make a few quick clarificatory remarks to minimize the danger of confusion. I then take up what I take to be the most pressing response Stamatiadis-Bréhier offers to my misgivings about the epistemic use of genealogies to debunk conspiracy theories. Lastly, I briefly respond to ...| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Volume 14, Issue 1, 1–84, January 2025 ❧ Armstrong, Rachel. 2025. “A Response to de Lorenzo’s ‘Towards a New Materialism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (1): 1–9. ❧ Kapusta…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Abstract| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective