As a process that validates information credibility, peer review is undeniably and incredibly valuable—when it works. But sometimes it doesn’t work as well as we’d like. The post Reviewing peer review first appeared on ACRLog.| ACRLog
We've reached an important historical inflection point in the funder/author/publisher triangular relationship. The post …so what exactly is going on between publishers and the NIH? first appeared on ACRLog.| ACRLog
We are happy to announce summer workshops from the Office of Scholarly Communications and Copyright. All of these workshops will take place on Zoom. These workshops are open to the Penn State University community and the public. SARI credit is available for several of these workshops. Please register in advance using the links below. For […]| Copyright Information
This post outlines a few examples of racism related to scholarly communications and provides resources that can help you and the researchers you work with learn about these issues.| Copyright Information
From a NISO Release (Full Text): Last month, NISO convened two workshops to explore how the scholarly communication community can collectively respond to challenges arising from the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in publishing and content distribution infrastructure. The workshops brought together participants from publishing houses, platform developers, and research technology teams to focus on […]| Library Journal infoDOCKET