Sanctions were imposed on plaintiff for breach of the duty to preserve certain communications in Cooper v. Balt. Gas & Elec. Co., 2025 WL 2774847 (D. Md. Sep. 30, 2025)(Rubin, J.). The Court held that it would instruct the jury: You are instructed that Plaintiff had a duty to preserve all relevant […]| E-Discovery LLC
Deamonte Spencer was convicted of murder and handgun charges. Among the evidentiary errors alleged on appeal was a challenge to authentication of printouts of profiles of Instagram pages. The Appellate Court of Maryland rejected the challenges and affirmed. Spencer v. State, 2025 WL 2741459 (Apl. Ct. Md. Sep. 26, 2025)(unreported). A local […]| E-Discovery LLC
Singleton v. Mazhari, 2025 WL 2736530 (D. Md. Sep. 29, 2025)(Austin, J.), covers a lot of ground. This blog addresses only two of the covered issues: (1) when is a motion for protective order untimely; and, (2) when is the requirement to meet and confer before filing such a motion waived as […]| E-Discovery LLC
“Although Plaintiff has not established each element of spoliation, the Court is troubled by Defendant’s conduct.” Feakes v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Authority, 2025 WL 2653155 (D. Md. Sep. 16, 2025)(Quereshi, J.).[1] The Court reserved on the issue of narrower-than-requested sanctions, which will be the focus of this blog. THE SLIP AND […]| E-Discovery LLC
Geofence warrants are a hotly-disputed topic. See Certiorari Petition to U.S. Supreme Court in 4th Circuit Geofence Decision (Aug. 4, 2025). The Petition for Certiorari states: “This case concerns the constitutionality of geofence warrants. For cell phone users to use certain services, their cell phones must continuously transmit their exact locations to […]| E-Discovery LLC
In In Re Tecfidera Antitrust Litigation, 2025 WL 2734539 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 25, 2025), the court wrote: “The parties’ cross motions for entry of their version of the ESI protocol noted that the parties agreed on all issues except for one relating to email threading, which Defendant seeks to include but Plaintiffs […]| E-Discovery LLC
A motion for sanctions was denied in an alleged misappropriation of trade secrets action by a former employer against departed employees. Lifestyle Realty, LLC v. Kirn, et al., 2025 WL 2719984 (D. Md. Sep. 23, 2025)(Simms, J.). Lifestyle Realty (“DKG”) is a real estate brokerage firm. It sued four individual defendants and […]| E-Discovery LLC
The ESI holding in Simms Showers LLP v. Jones, 2025 WL 2723558 (D. Md. Sep. 24, 2025)(Abelson, J.), is pretty straightforward. The recipient of a preservation demand is not obligated to respond. The Court wrote: Finally, Mr. Jones also alleges that sanctions are in order because he has “serious| E-Discovery LLC
A Maryland court expressed concern over WMATA’s failure to produce key inspection reports after a garage slip-and-fall but declined to impose harsh spoliation sanctions, reserving judgment on narrower remedies. The post Plaintiff Raised a Troubling Spoliation Issue, But Did Not Surmount All Hurdles, and a Ruling Was Reserved appeared first on EDRM.| EDRM
Much of the litigation over geofencing has been under the Fourth Amendment in criminal cases, and there has been a lot of it. See, e.g., Certiorari Petition to U.S. Supreme Court in 4th Circuit Geofence Decision – E-Discovery LLC (Aug. 5, 2025); Alvarez v. State, 2025 WL 2346165, at *4 (Tex. App. Au| E-Discovery LLC
Plaintiff’s offensive motion for sanctions in Oakley v. MSG Networks, Inc., 2025 WL 2076080, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2025)(“Oakley II”), was no match for defendants’ earlier request for sanctions in Oakley v. MSG Networks, Inc., 2025 WL 2061665, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2025)(“Oakley I”). In Oak| E-Discovery LLC
Early this century, when I was gaining a reputation as a trial lawyer who understood e-discovery and digital forensics, I was hired to work as the lead computer forensic examiner for plaintiffs in …| Ball in your Court
In this alleged wrongful termination and retaliation case, a “whistleblower” complaint was dismissed and monetary sanctions were also imposed. Pable v. Chicago Transit Authority, __ F. 4th __, 2025 WL 2102202 (7th Cir. Jul. 28, 2025). The appellate court affirmed sanctions against both an attorne| E-Discovery LLC
In Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Genesh, Inc., No. 24-2445-DDC-ADM (D. Kans. Jul. 18, 2025) (“Genesh IV”), after several rulings adverse to Genesh, the court appointed a Special Master to facilitate the plaintiff EEOC’s discovery from the defendant, Genesh, Inc. THE UNDERLYING CLAIMS “Genesh II| E-Discovery LLC
In Singleton v. Mazhari, 2024 WL 4644644 (D. Md. Oct. 30, 2024)(Austin, J.), non-party TEDCO’s blanket privilege and work product objections to a subpoena were denied; however, it lived to fight another day because the denial was without prejudice to file supported objections after a “meet and confe| E-Discovery LLC
In Authentication is key to direct and cross-examination (thedailyrecord.com) (Aug. 22, 2024), my friend Paul Sandler wrote: “It can be said that direct and cross-examination are the central features of the trial, and essential to examinations are the exhibits sought to be introduced in evidence.”| E-Discovery LLC
In Felder v. MGM National Harbor, the court ruled that overwriting video footage after 14 days was not spoliation.| EDRM
Many decisions state that the failure to timely provide an adequate privilege log may result in a waiver of the privilege. However, frequently they hold that there is no waiver on the facts presented.[1] In Bautech USA, Inc. v. Resolve Equip., Inc., 2024 WL 1929486 (S.D. Fla. May 2, 2024), untim| E-Discovery LLC
In 1968, the movie “Dracula Has Risen from the Grave” was released. Like Dracula, despite being long since buried, boilerplate “general objections” keep popping up in what sometimes looks like the children’s game of “Whac a Mole.” It is difficult to understand why the message about boilerplate “| E-Discovery LLC
In Kyle Rayome v. ABT Electronics, 2024 WL 1435098 (N.D. Ill. 2024), the court wrote that it “would prefer this case not go to the dark place where attorneys on one side demand that the attorneys on the other side provide declarations in which they swear they are telling the truth about complying wi| E-Discovery LLC
In Maryland, “sunshine” statutes such as the Open Meetings Act, Md. Code Ann., Gen’l. Prov. Art. §3-301, et seq., and the Public Information Act, Md. Code Ann., Gen’l. Prov. Art. §4-101, et seq., further the goal of open and transparent government. In State compliance board rules Cassilly’s offic| E-Discovery LLC
In Rullan v. Goden, 2024 WL 1191600 (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2024), the Hon. J. Mark Coulson construed a Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 motion to quash or modify a subpoena, which would have been heard in New York, as a Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) motion for protective order that was resolved in the District of Maryland. Rullan| E-Discovery LLC
In Smith v. Wormuth, 2024 WL 1012887 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2024), the District Court again denied a spoliation motion as untimely. In the immortal words of Yankee Hall of Famer Yogi Bera: “It’s deja vu all over again.” Smith was an employment dispute arising out of a contentious relationship, with an| E-Discovery LLC
Can a witness authenticate a video if the video contains images that the witness did not see? In Md. Supreme Court to rule on Baltimore criminal case involving video authentication - Maryland Daily Record (thedailyrecord.com) (Feb. 22, 2024), Rachel Konieczny reported on a novel and important authe| E-Discovery LLC
“ESI Protocols” are discussed in judicial opinions, articles, webinars, and blogs. They are flexible and useful; however, they may not meet all of the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f). After a Rule 26(f) conference, that Rule requires a “report” with a “discovery plan” that contains information| E-Discovery LLC
