The EPA is dead wrong about greenhouse gas emissions
OPINION | Killing transparency about GHG emissions undermines innovation and hurts markets| Corporate Knights
OPINION | Killing transparency about GHG emissions undermines innovation and hurts markets| Corporate Knights
On August 1, 2025, the US Environmental Protection Agency announced it was proposing to reconsider its 2009 endangerment finding about greenhouse gas emissions. “Reconsidering” here means rescind, revoke, roll back. In this post I look at why this action is a dagger to the heart of greenhouse gas regulation. Continue reading →| Unsolicited Feedback
By Brian Bienkowski Boosting US solar power by 15% could reduce annual carbon dioxide emissions from the nation’s electricity sector by more than 8.5 million metric tons, the equivalent of removing the emissions of nearly two million gas-powered cars annually, according to a new study.| The New Lede
By Brian Bienkowski Republicans are proposing deep cuts to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill, which additionally would provide new protections for pesticide makers and would limit federal help for farmers dealing with “forever chemical” contamination.| The New Lede
A healthy portion of animal agriculture’s bad rap comes from the falsehood that livestock is the primary source of greenhouse gases in our society.| CLEAR Center
Mitloehner lab Ph.D. student Samantha Werth, M.S. explains that cattle are often thought to contribute to climate change because they belch methane (CH4), a greenhouse gas. While this is true, cattle do belch methane, it is actually part of an important natural cycle, known as the biogenic carbon cycle.| CLEAR Center
What should be the more important to the Scottish Government? Saving the planet or saving Scotland? Recent activity of the Scottish Government (or should I say the Scottish Green Government) has co…| Angry Weegie
New Zealand has got to do the hard yards on its greenhouse gas emissions.| E2NZ.org
