Challenging a decision made by the Home Office can be a daunting task, fraught with legal complexities. At the heart of this process lies the Pre-Action Protocol, a set of guidelines designed to ensure fair and transparent proceedings before resorting to judicial review. The post The Pre-Action Protocol in Immigration Judicial Review appeared first on Richmond Chambers.| Richmond Chambers
By Mohamed ‘Arafa. In democratic societies, the relationship between democracy and religion can be harmonious, as democracy ensures the freedom to practice religion, while religious diversity can enrich public discourse. This post explores the intersection of democracy, judicial review, and Shārīe‘ā law, focusing on the tensions and possibilities that arise when religious legal principles interact with democratic governance. It discusses how Article 2 of the Egyptian Constitution, whic...| TRAFO – Blog for Transregional Research
The Centre is excited to announce the publication of a new special issue of the Constitutional Forum! This special issue (34.1) flows from a workshop co-organized by the uOttawa Public Law Centre and the Centre for Constitutional Studies (uAlberta), held at uOttawa in March 2024. The workshop brought together a…| Centre for Constitutional Studies
In a recently completed paper, Philip Murray and I develop a defence of what we term the classical account of administrative law. The question with which we are centrally concerned is whether (as t…| Public Law for Everyone
There is much to learn from a recent English decision on police impartiality| Double Aspect
Government proposals to streamline judicial review of decisions authorising major infrastructure projects have been branded ‘Trumpian’. As well as being misplaced, such criticisms risk …| Public Law for Everyone
On 23 January, Sir Keir Starmer announced plans to ‘stop blockers getting in the way’ of infrastructure development, by introducing restrictions on judicial review of infrastructure projects. Notwi…| UK Constitutional Law Association
Loper Bright significantly expands the power of the Supreme Court at the expense of democratic institutions of government.| The Regulatory Review
