As the redistricting saga continues, condensed timelines for 2026 elections concern county officials | Strategic Partnerships, Inc. | Texas Government Insider| Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
Lawyers representing the state and the Republican National Committee asked a federal appellate court Wednesday to reverse a lower court order blocking two provisions of a controversial election reform law the GOP-controlled General Assembly passed in 2021. A U.S. District Court judge granted a preliminary injunction in 2023 to civil rights and voting rights groups […]| The Georgia Sun
I’m one of the 43 percent of Americans who according to Gallup, self-identify not as Republicans or Democrats, but as […]| Broad + Liberty
The Constitutional Court’s ruling is a breath of fresh air for more inclusive, transparent, and competitive presidential elections in Indonesia| Indonesia at Melbourne
Following is the case brief for Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018) Case Summary of Gill v. Whitford: In 2010, the Republican majority in Wisconsin gerrymandered the State’s districts to ensure a Republican majority in the State for the foreseeable future. Democratic voters sued in federal court, alleging that the partisan gerrymander violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. [...] The post Gill v. Whitford appeared first on Legal Dictionary.| Legal Dictionary
