A recent decision demonstrates the importance of following the Rules and the duty to cooperate, after a “quick peek” proved that an opponent’s discovery responses were incomplete. The Court wrote: “Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ interrogatories and requests for production of documents are vague and confusing. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and […]| E-Discovery LLC
In Golat v. Wisconsin State Court System, 2025 WL 2466697 (W.D. Wis. Aug. 27, 2025)(“Golat II”), the court wrote that omitting a relevant email that was contained in an email chain violated counsel’s duty of candor to the court. This blog is an update of Half-Baked Motion to Compel Was Not Prompt, […]| E-Discovery LLC
In Rutherford v. Central Bank of Kansas City, 2025 WL 2432218, at *6-7 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 21, 2025), one of several issues was whether a litigant must produce information that was already in possession of the opponent’s counsel from other litigation. The court held that duplicative production was unn| E-Discovery LLC
Bloomberg Law reports that Meta Files for Appellate Relief to Bar Zuckerberg Deposition (Jul. 11, 2025). Mr. Ufonobong Umanah wrote that “Meta claims Ninth Circuit courts have split over apex doctrine.” He added: The presumption that CEOs get to avoid depositions—formalized under the apex doctrin| E-Discovery LLC
In Singleton v. Mazhari, 2024 WL 4644644 (D. Md. Oct. 30, 2024)(Austin, J.), non-party TEDCO’s blanket privilege and work product objections to a subpoena were denied; however, it lived to fight another day because the denial was without prejudice to file supported objections after a “meet and confe| E-Discovery LLC
In 1968, the movie “Dracula Has Risen from the Grave” was released. Like Dracula, despite being long since buried, boilerplate “general objections” keep popping up in what sometimes looks like the children’s game of “Whac a Mole.” It is difficult to understand why the message about boilerplate “| E-Discovery LLC
