Can an individual request the opportunity to provide an approved screening device [“ASD”] sample at a police station or at a later time after having refused to comply with a roadside ASD demand?| Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
In R v. Korduner, 2025 ABCA 30, a majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal held that an incriminating statement compelled by Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act could be used by police as grounds for demanding a breath sample under s. 320.28 of the Criminal Code, because it would not violate the principle against self-incrimination protected […] The post Summary of R v. Korduner, 2025 ABCA 30 appeared first on Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.| Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Canada's Top Court to Determine Whether Expunged Police Discipline Records Are Subject to Mcneil Disclosure.| Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP