US GAAP and IFRS present the effects pension leverage differently in financial statements, notably leverage arising from pension fund asset allocation. This complicates the comparison and interpretation of performance measures and valuation multiples. We use Delta Air Lines to illustrate the positive impact of the US GAAP ‘expected return’ approach on reported profit, including the effect of optimistic return assumptions. If Delta had applied the IFRS ‘net interest’ approach we estima...| The Footnotes Analyst
You might assume that a change in enterprise value completely accrues to equity investors; however, this is often not the case. Other claims, such as debt or equity warrants also change in value as enterprise value changes. Understanding this effect can be important when analysing many companies, but especially those in financial distress. Option-like characteristics of debt and equity claims drive the allocation of changes in enterprise value between debt and equity investors. We apply an in...| The Footnotes Analyst
Reported operating cash flow, leverage and net working capital measures, may be misleading if a company engages in supply chain financing. The impact can be significant but, at present, calculating the effect and making adjustments is difficult. Additional IFRS disclosures proposed by the IASB will help. We explain the new disclosures and provide an interactive model to illustrate how to use them to calculate more realistic measures of cash flow, leverage and working capital. The adjustments ...| The Footnotes Analyst
There is usually at least one metric that gives valuation-based support for an investment, even if this is contradicted by other indicators of relative or absolute value. You may have heard comments such as “… but it looks cheap on EV/EBITDA” to help justify a particular investment recommendation. We examine why different multiples can give conflicting indications of relative value. For example, food-on-the-go stock Greggs trades at a 35% discount to rival Dominos Pizza, based on EV/EBI...| The Footnotes Analyst
Changes to convertible bond accounting under US GAAP will mean higher reported debt but, paradoxically, a lower (and sometimes zero) interest expense. In our view, the resulting increase in earnings is artificial, fails to faithfully represent the cost of convertible financing and will not benefit investors. The recent surge in convertible issuance, and the use of so-called convertible bond hedges, may have more to do with favourable accounting than favourable economics. We use the recent con...| The Footnotes Analyst
Many companies look beyond straight debt and ordinary shares when raising finance, with capital structures increasingly including an array of complex financial instruments. This presents challenges for investors, particularly when analysing performance and leverage. We investigate the effects of one form of ‘hybrid’ financing - perpetual super-subordinated bonds – where securities with debt-like features may be reported as equity in financial statements. Recent proposals by the IASB to ...| The Footnotes Analyst
DCF valuation models can either be based on free cash flow attributable to equity investors or the free cash flow available for all providers of finance. Each requires a different approach to allowing for financial leverage, including adjustments to beta and recognition of the debt interest tax shield. We present an interactive DCF model that illustrates discounted equity cash flow and discounted enterprise cash flow using both the WACC and APV methods. Understanding each approach helps...| The Footnotes Analyst
It can be observed that higher financial leverage increases equity beta. However, the relationship between the unleveraged asset or enterprise beta (the beta of the underlying operating business), and leveraged equity beta that is commonly applied in practice, is incomplete. We explain the relevance of asset betas in equity valuation and why it is important to analyse the beta of debt finance and the value, and riskiness, of the debt interest tax shield when delevering and relevering equity b...| The Footnotes Analyst
The fact that the cost of debt finance is tax deductible, whereas the cost of equity is not, seems to give a structural advantage to debt finance. The value (if any) of this ‘tax shield’ is either an explicit or more likely implicit component of any equity valuation. The most commonly quoted calculation of the value of the debt interest tax shield understates value by ignoring growth but overstates value by ignoring the effect of personal taxes. We explain how to incorporate these often-i...| The Footnotes Analyst