Val Dusek: A Memorial, Francis Remedios. Book: ❦ Soler, Léna. 2025. Contingency Is Here to Stay—in Science as in Any Other Human Enterprise. Blacksburg, VA: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. Volume 14, Issue 8, 1–75, August 2025 ❧ Basham,... Read More ›Source| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond to Francesco Censon’s paper, “The Rejected Expert and the Knowledge’s Half-Blood” (2025). In what follows, I will discuss Censon’s concept of Knowledge’s…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
On encountering Charles Lassiter’s article (2024a) “Reading the Signs: From Dyadic to Triadic Views for Identifying Experts,” I felt totally in tune with his vision. A few years ago, I too had published an article in the Italian journal Prometeo on the crisis of competence (Censon 2020) which, although it did not have the theoretical breadth of the one written by Lassiter, touched on the same points. … [please read below the rest of the article].| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
In 2024, the SERRC published 123 posts. The most substantive work—replies, responses, reviews, articles, interviews, essays—one can access through our list of monthly issues, by browsing our Site…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Volume 13, Issue 7, 1–55, July 2024 ❧ Ogbonnaya, L. Uchenna. 2024. “Interrogation of Cultural Experience? A Reply to Uduagwu and an Affirmation of the Ontology Criterion for African Philosophy.”…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Forgive me, philosophers, for I have sinned epistemically. It has been many years since my last confession. To start, I forgot to update my priors a few times. I haven’t always followed research on…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Abstract The recognition problem—or, the difficulty of non-experts to appropriately distinguish experts from cleverly disguised fakes—is a perennial problem in expertise studies. And the more we learn…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
I am not a philosopher. Nor in my own publications have I intentionally followed any of the professional canons of philosophical reasoning or philosophical genres.[1] Nonetheless…| Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective