In articles and discussions about monorepos, there's one frequently alleged key benefit: atomic commits across the whole tree let you make changes to both a library's implementation and the clients in a single commit. Many authors even go as far to claim that this is the only benefit of monorepos. I like monorepos, but that particular claim makes no sense! It's not how you'd actually make backwards incompatible changes, such as interface refactorings, in a large monorepo. Instead the process ...
