Updated on Sept. 4 at 10:00 a.m. Two months after winning a case on universal injunctions that stemmed from President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship, the Trump administration […]| SCOTUSblog
Before joining SCOTUSblog as its executive editor, Zach practiced law at a boutique law firm in New York, specializing in white collar criminal defense and complex commercial litigation. Zach graduated from Georgetown Law where he served as editor-in-chief of the law review. After practicing briefly in biglaw, he clerked for federal judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Prior to his legal career, Zach was an ...| SCOTUSblog
Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D.| SCOTUSblog
SCOTUSblog Health Care resource page Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act symposium page Lyle Denniston’s Media Guide” From the Oral Argument SCOTUSblog’s argument audio highlights Merits Briefs for the Petitioners […]| SCOTUSblog
EMERGENCY DOCKET | SCOTUSblog
Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]| SCOTUSblog
Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]| SCOTUSblog
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES | SCOTUSblog
Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]| SCOTUSblog
When ChatGPT, a cutting-edge artificial-intelligence chatbot, launched in November, it captured the attention of the legal community. Some lawyers worried that the program — which can generate eerily human-sounding text […]| SCOTUSblog
If you find an error in any of our posts, please report it to feedback [at] scotusblog.com.| SCOTUSblog
Chiles v. Salazar| SCOTUSblog
10/16/2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2024)| SCOTUSblog
Alabama v. California| SCOTUSblog
WHAT WE'RE READING | SCOTUSblog
EMPIRICAL SCOTUS | SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released a long list of orders from the justices’ private conference on Feb. 21 – the first regularly scheduled conference in nearly a month. […]| SCOTUSblog
EMERGENCY DOCKET | SCOTUSblog
09/19/2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)| SCOTUSblog
Villarreal v. Texas| SCOTUSblog
Neilly v. Michigan| SCOTUSblog
Ellingburg v. United States| SCOTUSblog
Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research| SCOTUSblog
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic| SCOTUSblog
A divided Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down a request by the Trump administration to lift an order by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that had directed the State […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration, at least for now, to move forward with deporting immigrants to countries not specifically identified in their removal orders. In a […]| SCOTUSblog
Holding: Parents challenging the Montgomery County Board of Education’s introduction of certain “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with the board’s decision to withhold parental opt outs from that instruction, are entitled to a preliminary injunction.| SCOTUSblog
Holding: Because universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts, the court grants the government’s applications for a partial stay of the injunctions entered below regarding the implementation and enforcement of the Trump administration’s Jan. 20 executive order ending birthright citizenship, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.| SCOTUSblog
09/09/2024Application (24A254) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 23, 2024 to October 7, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.| SCOTUSblog
Argument previews and analyses, opinion analyses, posts with links to argument transcripts and audio, and other news relating to cases granted for either the current term’s docket or next term’s docket| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on May 15 on the federal government’s request to be allowed to implement President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship – the […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in yet another dispute over the separation of powers. The case is a challenge to the constitutionality of the structure of […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning added two new cases, involving the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and restitution orders, to its docket for the 2025-26 term. The announcement came […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Wednesday seemed poised to uphold the federal program that provides schools, libraries, and underserved areas with access to affordable telephone and high-speed internet services. A conservative […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over whether Planned Parenthood has a legal right under federal civil rights laws to challenge the order by South Carolina’s governor barring abortion […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court blocked the execution of Ruben Gutierrez, who was sentenced to die after 7 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday for the 1998 stabbing death of 85-year-old Escolastica Harrison in […]| SCOTUSblog
Tonight the Supreme Court put a temporary hold on the execution of Texas death-row inmate Ruben Gutierrez, who had been scheduled to die at 7 p.m. EDT. In a short […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to weigh in on the constitutionality of Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy” – that is, the effort to “convert” someone’s sexual orientation or gender […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday was divided over whether a Texas man on death row has a legal right to sue, known as standing, to bring federal civil rights claims […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added three more cases two of which will be argued together to its docket for the 2024-25 term. In a brief unsigned order, the […]| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will decide whether a group of Maryland parents can opt to have their children exempted from LGBTQ-themed storybooks. The justices on Friday afternoon granted Mahmoud v. Taylor, […]| SCOTUSblog
This article was updated on June 28 at 3:46 p.m. In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. The decision will likely have far-| SCOTUSblog
Merits Briefs Brief for Petitioners Russell Bruesewitz and Robalee Bruesewitz, Parents and Natural Guardians of Hannah Bruesewitz, a minor child, and In Their Own Right Brief for Respondent Wyeth, Inc. F/K/A Wyeth Laboratories, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Wyeth Lederle, Wyeth Lederle Vaccines a| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
This article was updated on June 30 at 4:00 p.m. By a vote of 6-3, the justices ruled that the Biden administration overstepped its authority last year when it announced that it would cancel up to $400 billion in student loans. The Biden administration had said that as many as 43 million Americans| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Former President Donald Trump loomed large over the Supreme Court’s 2023-24 term. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee for 2024 brought two cases to the justices and fared well in both; Trump could also benefit from the decision in a third case, brought by a defendant charged in the Jan.| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a North Dakota truck stop can bring a challenge to a regulation issued 13 years ago by the Federal Reserve Board. In a 6-3 vote divided along ideological lines, the justices significantly expanded plaintiffs’ ability to sue federal regulators, ruling that the s| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Tuesday added five new cases – two of which will be argued together – to its docket for the 2024-25 term. The justices declined to take up a number of notable cases, including challenges to Illinois’s regulation of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and a challenge to t| SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday sent a pair of challenges to laws in Texas and Florida that would regulate how large social media companies control content posted on their sites back to the lower courts for another look. In a decision by Justice Elena Kagan, the court explained that both lower courts ha| SCOTUSblog
This article was updated on July 1 at 3:32 p.m. In a historic decision, a divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former presidents can never be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office, and that there is at least a presumption that they have immunity for their offici| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court Procedure - SCOTUSblog| SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court| SCOTUSblog
