One of the joys of scholarship is that it offers plenty of opportunity for you to be a doofus. I’ve taken advantage of that over the years. It goes with the territory: if your scholarship is worth anything, it will venture into the unknown (unknown to you, at least), and the unknown is where you stumble. My most recent opportunity ... Read More The post More on Time Zones and References to Time in Contracts appeared first on Adams on Contract Drafting.| Adams on Contract Drafting
File this under “Better late than never.” Way late. The second printing of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting came out in spring 2024. If you have a copy of the first printing, you might want to note in it changes I made to the second printing. Here they are: As changes go, I think we can say they’re ... Read More| Adams on Contract Drafting
As the author of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting, Ken Adams is the leading authority on the building blocks of contract language.| Adams on Contract Drafting
Yesterday I received from longtime reader Chris Lemens an email complaining about someone opting for indemnify, hold harmless, and exonerate. It’s bad enough to have hold harmless, not to mention defend—why add exonerate! I looked into indemnify plus exonerate, and yes, it’s a thing: But inspired by Chris, I looked for other gratuitous additions to indemnify, and I found protect: ... Read More The post If “Indemnify, Defend, and Hold Harmless” Isn’t Enough appeared first on Adams ...| Adams on Contract Drafting
[Revised on 11 September 2025 to change the title and the text. The original title was If AI Gets One Thing Wrong, It Might Get Other Stuff Wrong.] Recently I saw on LinkedIn, in this post by Kara Dowdall, the following assessment of a contract: This assessment was generated by artificial intelligence. Or more specifically, by Claude, from Anthropic. I ... Read More| Adams on Contract Drafting
The image below is from my repost of a LinkedIn post by Chris Lemens, who has been reading my stuff for as long as I have written stuff. What prompted my repost was two comments Chris added to this LinkedIn post by Nada Alnajafi: So Chris makes it explicit—the simplest way to demonstrate your value to Chris would be to ... Read More| Adams on Contract Drafting
The next Drafting Clearer Contracts presentation is on 23 and 24 July 2025, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:10 p.m. Eastern Time (US). Go here for more information Why should you consider registering? Because as I explain in this 2024 blog post, you cannot be an informed consumer of contract language without consulting my book A Manual of Style for Contract ... Read More The post The Next “Drafting Clearer Contracts” Presentation Is on 23 and 24 July 2025 appeared first on Adams on Contract Drafting.| Adams on Contract Drafting
In a previous blog post (here), I offer thoughts on a law review article, Tara Chowdhury, Faith Chudkowski & Mitu Gulati, The Form Knows Best, 79 U. of Miami L. Rev. 607 (2025). The same issue of that law review contains Glenn West’s response to that article—The Form Doesn’t Know Anything: A Response to Chowdhury, Chudkowski & Gulati, 79 U. ... Read More The post Lawyers Pay Attention to Caselaw, Unless They Don’t: A Thought Prompted by Glenn West’s Response to Chowdhury, Chudkowski...| Adams on Contract Drafting
One of my corporate partners, Thomson Reuters Asia, is contemplating something old-fashioned—having me do Drafting Clearer Contracts presentations in Hong Kong, Singapore, Jakarta, Bangkok, Manila, and Mumbai (details below). Yes—really. I offer Drafting Clearer Contracts training online, but in-person presentations can be more fun. But my contact at TR tells me that some potential participants have suggested there’s no point. ... Read More| Adams on Contract Drafting
In a LinkedIn post, I challenged readers to find for me a contract that used shall be or will be in creating an autonomous definition. I wasn’t surprised that I was the only entrant in that thrilling competition. I submitted the following example: Using shall be in this context is as unhelpful as using is. That’s something I discuss in ... Read More The post It’s Never Good to Use “Shall Be” in an Autonomous Definition appeared first on Adams on Contract Drafting.| Adams on Contract Drafting
My notion of offering an on-demand module of my Drafting Clearer Contracts training is slowly shifting from a gleam in my eye to reality. Videos and Quizzes This module will consist of 200+ short videos, some proportion of them accompanied by automated quizzes. The foundation of Drafting Clearer Contracts training is my book A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. ... Read More The post On-Demand “Drafting Clearer Contracts” Training: Sign Up for News! appeared first on Adams on Contract...| Adams on Contract Drafting
Today, thanks to a tweet by @360venturelaw, I stumbled upon a blog post entitled “Famous Last Words: ‘The Shorter the Better.'” It’s by Mike Stanczyk, a corporate attorney based in Syracuse, New York. It’s a sensible post, but Mike wraps it up with the following point: In closing I will say that when possible I prefer and do use “plain English” agreements. However, its ... Read More| Adams on Contract Drafting
