Dr. Daniel Rietiker *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […] The post Contextualizing Semenya: The current and future role of the European Court of Human Rights in sports appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
Dr. Lena Holzer *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. *** […] The post A Human Rights Analysis of Semenya and its Potential Effects on the Rights of Transgender Athletes appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
Dr. Michele Krech1 *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […] The post The Semenya Judgment and Women’s Eligibility in Sport: Nothing Changes, Everything Does! appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
Dr. Sarah Thin *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. An introduction to the symposium and the case can be found here. […] The post Deterritorialising Semenya: Jurisdiction and Extraterritoriality in the Grand Chamber judgment appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
Dr. Antoine Duval & Dr. Faraz Shahlaei1 *** Between the first and the eight of October, the Strasbourg Observers blog is hosting a symposium examining various aspects of the ECtHR’s ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland. The symposium was curated by Dr. Antoine Duval and Dr. Faraz Shahlaei. This first post in the symposium aims to […] The post Examining the Grand Chamber’s Ruling in Semenya v Switzerland: Introducing the Symposium appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
By Dr Costas Paraskeva and Eleni Meleagrou Introduction On June 10, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (‘The Court’) delivered its judgment in the case of K.V. Mediterranean Tours Limited v. Türkiye . This is the fourth time that the Court has reviewed the domestic remedy set up by Türkiye, within its subordinate administration of […] The post The quest for an effective remedy has downgraded the rights to property and home of the Greek Cypriot IDPs and upgraded the de facto aut...| Strasbourg Observers
by Gvantsa Danelia The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) recently delivered its judgment in Matchavariani v. Georgia (Application no. 46852/21). At first glance, the case might seem like another routine finding of a violation in an administrative detention case. However, a closer examination reveals a subtle yet crucial message from Strasbourg, particularly concerning a […] The post Beyond the Finding: Matchavariani v. Georgia and the Lingering Questions for Protest Adjudication in Geo...| Strasbourg Observers
By dr. Akiko Ejima *** To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging dialogue with current and former […] The post Significance of the Strasbourg Human Rights Case Law Beyond Europe – The Impact of the ECHR Jurisprudence on Asian Apex Courts appeared...| Strasbourg Observers
By Dimitrios Kagiaros In Backović v. Serbia (no. 2), the European Court of Human Rights’ third section (henceforth ECtHR or the Court) revisited the thorny issue of lawyers making inappropriate or caustic remarks towards judges in court proceedings. In a 5-2 judgment, the Court found that a fine for contempt of court against a lawyer […] The post Backović v. Serbia (no. 2): Blurring the line between legitimate criticism and unacceptable insults by lawyers in court proceedings appeared f...| Strasbourg Observers
By Florian Kriener The right to assemble peacefully as guaranteed by Article 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) is essential in any democracy. It protects the right of a democracy’s citizens to unite and publicly demand changes in public policy. Peaceful assemblies and protests are therefore widely recognized for their role in […] The post Russ v Germany: On broad definitions in the regulation of peaceful assemblies appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
By Dr. Alice Dejean de la Bâtie The events that led to the case of Ludes and Others v. France began in early 2019, when climate activists, mostly affiliated with the French environmental campaign Action Non-Violente COP21, launched a coordinated protest under the banner #DécrochonsMacron (“Take Down Macron”). Their objective was both symbolic and strategic: […] The post Ludes v. France: The imperative of a strong necessity test to counter the criminalisation of protest appeared first ...| Strasbourg Observers
By Dr. Giorgi Nakashidze The European Court of Human Rights’ (“Court”) judgment of 9 July 2025 in Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (‘Judgment’) marks a milestone in the Court’s evolving engagement with international humanitarian law (IHL). Although the Judgment raises numerous issues deserving of detailed analysis (see e.g. Milanović, Risini, Khachatryan), this post focuses […] The post Not Afraid of International Humanitarian Law Anymore: the European Court of Human Right...| Strasbourg Observers
by Alex Geraki Trimi The case of Almukhlas and Al-Maliki v. Greece concerned the interception of a yacht carrying 94 migrants near the Greek island of Symi by members of the Greek Coast Guard and Frontex (under the Joint operation Poseidon) that resulted in the killing of a child of Iraqi nationality, Ameer, by the […]| Strasbourg Observers
By Jerome Joseph The case of Vyacheslavova and others v. Ukraine stems from an incident of civil unrest which occurred in Odesa on 2 May 2014 and which claimed 48 lives. Released in March 2025, the case appears to have escaped the same level of academic attention which followed Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia […] The post Fanning the flames of social unrest: reflections on Vyacheslavova and others v. Ukraine and the regulation of online disinformation appeared first on Strasbourg Obse...| Strasbourg Observers
by Georgios A. Serghides[i] *** A note from the team: To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging […] The post Stereotyped narratives on migration: Is the ECtHR’s reasoning stereotype-proof? appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
By Sibel Yilmaz Coşkun In its judgment of Derrek and Others v. Russia (29 April 2025; hereinafter Derrek), the European Court of Human Rights (the Court/ECtHR) addressed a police raid on an LGBT workshop, during which participants faced humiliating treatment and forced drug testing. The Court unanimously found violations of Articles 5 §1 and […] The post Derrek and Others v. Russia: hesitancy on the path to a qualitative Article 3 threshold in LGBT-Phobia Cases? appeared ...| Strasbourg Observers
by Dr Dolores Morondo Taramundi *** To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging dialogue with current and […] The post The Role of Vulnerability and Stereotyping in Addressing Discrimination Against Migrants appeared first on Strasbourg Observers.| Strasbourg Observers
by dr. Stefanos Xenofontos On 3 July 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’ or ‘the Court’) delivered its judgment in the case of N.T. v. Cyprus, unanimously finding violations of Articles 3, 8, and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’) arising from the Cypriot authorities’ failure to effectively investigate and […] The post State Complicity and the Gendered Architecture of Disbelief: A Critical Reading of N.T. v. Cyprus appeared first on Strasbourg...| Strasbourg Observers
By Dr. Ufuk Yeşil On July 8 2025, the European Court of Human Rights’ (the ECtHR or the Court) addressed violations stemming from the prolonged detention of Selahattin Demirtaş, the former HDP co-chair, in Selahattin Demirtaş v. Türkiye (No. 4), exposing systemic judicial abuses targeting political dissent in Türkiye. This blog post analyzes this judgment, and connects it […]| Strasbourg Observers
by Alberto Godioli and Jennifer Young *** To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging dialogue with current […]| Strasbourg Observers
Dr. Marialena Tsirli *** A note from the team: To celebrate the 15th anniversary of the Strasbourg Observers Blog, we organised an in-person symposium with scholars, practitioners, and members of the ECtHR on 8–9 May 2025 in Ghent. Connecting in person with so many regular contributors was a wonderful experience and led to engaging dialogue […]| Strasbourg Observers