Can We Know Whether a Profiler is Accurate? · Stefan-Marr.de
Measuring causes profiles to change, so is there a way to work around it and know whether a profile is accurate?| stefan-marr.de
I am personally interested in making interpreters faster, detecting and| stefan-marr.de
If you have been following the adventures of our hero over the last couple of years,| stefan-marr.de
Measuring causes profiles to change, so is there a way to work around it and know whether a profile is accurate?| stefan-marr.de
I am personally interested in making interpreters faster, detecting and| stefan-marr.de
New job and responsibilities: what's now important to me?| stefan-marr.de
Making programs slower can be useful to find...| stefan-marr.de
Computing at Kent and PLAS: Thanks for everything, and see you soon!| stefan-marr.de
Last year, we looked at how well sampling profilers work on top of the JVM. Unfortunately, they suffer from issues such as safepoint bias and may not correctly attribute observed run time to the correct methods because of the complexities introduced by inlining and other compiler optimizations.| Stefan-Marr.de
A comparative study of abstract-syntax-tree and bytecode interpreters on top of meta-compilation systems.| stefan-marr.de
Bar charts oversimplify and should be avoided: Box Plots, Or Better!| stefan-marr.de
Using VTune to measure where Truffle-based bytecode interpreters spend their time.| stefan-marr.de
Estimating the performance of programming language implementations.| stefan-marr.de
A look into the implementation details of CPython's Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) and how they changed between Python 3.9 and the current development branch that will become Python 3.13.| stefan-marr.de
A brief overview of our study of abstract-syntax-tree and bytecode interpreters on top of RPython and the GraalVM metacompilation systems.| stefan-marr.de
Sampling profilers can go surprisingly wrong on simple programs. Here a brief overview, and all details in our paper!| stefan-marr.de
