State v. Erickson :: 1989 :: Minnesota Supreme Court Decisions :: Minnesota Case Law :: Minnesota Law :: U.S. Law :: Justia
State v. Erickson - 449 N.W.2d 707| Justia Law
State v. Erickson - 449 N.W.2d 707| Justia Law
There Is a Newer Version of the California Code | Justia Law
Justia Free Databases of U.S. Laws, Codes & Statutes| Justia Law
Justia Free Databases of U.S. Laws, Codes & Statutes| Justia Law
Hall v. State - 268 Ga. 89, 485 S.E.2d 755| Justia Law
Justia Free Databases of U.S. Laws, Codes & Statutes| Justia Law
JRJ Pusok Holdings, LLC v. The State of Texas and Kyle Madsen in his Official Capacity as Director of Right of Way Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County| Justia Law
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's action alleging that Domino's Pizza's website and mobile application were not fully accessible to a blind or visually impaired person, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.| Justia Law
There Is a Newer Version of the Illinois Compiled Statutes | Justia Law
Justia Free Databases of U.S. Laws, Codes & Statutes| Justia Law
Plaintiff, a long-time customer with a visual disability who must access websites with screen reader software, filed suit against Winn-Dixie under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) after he was unable to access Winn-Dixie's website with his software. The district court found that Winn-Dixie's website violated the ADA.| Justia Law
Plaintiffs, a transgender youth, their parents, and two healthcare professionals, sought to enjoin Arkansas Act 626, which prohibits healthcare professionals from providing gender transition procedures to any individual under the age of 18 or from referring any such individual to any healthcare professional for gender transition procedures. The district court enjoined the Act, and the State appealed.| Justia Law
State v. Walsh - 495 N.W.2d 602| Justia Law
Arkansas Constitution| Justia Law
Gingles v. Edmisten, 590 F. Supp. 345 (E.D.N.C. 1984) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina| Justia Law
Ashton, a transgender high school senior, requested to use the boys’ restroom while at school. The Kenosha School District denied the request, indicating that Ashton’s mere presence would invade the privacy rights of his male classmates. In his suit under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act and the Equal Protection Clause, Ashton sought preliminary injunctive relief, asserting that his attempts to avoid using the bathroom exacerbated his vasovagal syncope, which renders Ashton suscep...| Justia Law
Leppert v. Leppert - 519 N.W.2d 287| Justia Law
There is a newer version of the Colorado Revised Statutes | Justia Law
National Association of Manufacturers et al v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al, No. 7:2022cv00163 - Document 21 (W.D. Tex. 2022) case opinion from the Western District of Texas US Federal District Court| Justia Law
Plaintiffs, authors of published books under copyright, filed suit against Google for copyright infringement. Google, acting without permission of rights holders, has made digital copies of tens of millions of books, including plaintiffs', through its Library Project and its Google books project. The district court concluded that Google's actions constituted fair use under 17 U.S.C. 107. On appeal, plaintiffs challenged the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Google. The co...| Justia Law
