Richard Morrison and John Mozena on ESG and the potential to roll back corporate welfare| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
World Cherry Capital’s regulatory reform is a significant step toward developing more housing| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Elected officials want an easy job, and that’s not good for the public| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Taxpayers spend millions on government-run internet that is more expensive than private service| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Budget deal would pluck feathers of SOAR fund| Mackinac Center
New Jersey court dismisses case making same claims as Nessel lawsuit against oil companies| Mackinac Center
State subsidy deals created only 1 out of 11 jobs promised in headlines| Mackinac Center
A New Look at the Evidence| Mackinac Center
More college students support using force to suppress dissent| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
No school district would lose funds under plan to provide more money with fewer strings| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Montana seeks to rein in Medicaid abuse; Ohio public employees flee unions| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Will Maleyko choose high standards or the status quo?| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Costs balloon as pharmacies and hospitals exploit loopholes| Mackinac Center
Projecting the Costs of Gov. Whitmer’s MI Healthy Climate Plan| Mackinac Center
Glenn Moots discusses the evolution of church and state in America| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
EGLE seeks to feather its own nest| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
‘Regulations born of fear threaten to derail beneficial innovation’| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Census Bureau did not exclude students from population count| Mackinac Center
Still waiting on March 5 information request to Michigan Economic Development Corp.| Mackinac Center
Lawsuit seeks to restore accountability in the budget process| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Moving money from categorical grants to general fund would leave more for superintendents to spend| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Kansas homeowners get tax relief under 2021 law; Illinois gets little for massive college spending| Mackinac Center
If you read it in high school, pour yourself a Victory Gin and take a fresh look| Mackinac Center
Michigan students show another alarming decline in 2025 M-STEP results| Mackinac Center
House proposal would wind down “categorical grants” and give more freedom to school districts| Mackinac Center
Practicing restraint keeps political options open| Mackinac Center
Lawsuit demands records detailing how tax dollars are used in Detroit redevelopment deal| Mackinac Center
Dave Hebert on why many voters believe economists have conned the American people| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Global Link fiasco isn’t an aberration| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Let builders build| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
School promises dynamic campus life, delivers nothing but pixels; and paying students can’t do anything about it| Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Todd Nesbit and Mike LaFaive break down their data on rising taxes and cigarette smuggling| Mackinac Center
House plan would increase funding by 68%| Mackinac Center
Funding has not kept up with inflation in Whitmer era| Mackinac Center
Comments submitted to the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy| Mackinac Center
Order includes more than 90 policy changes| Mackinac Center
Buckeye State makes power production easier and more transparent| Mackinac Center
Comments submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency| Mackinac Center
And if corporate welfare works, why is Idaho eating Michigan’s lunch?| Mackinac Center
The illusion of a balanced energy mix makes good rhetoric but poor policy| Mackinac Center
Governor’s global warming pipe dream will leave Michiganders colder, hotter, poorer| Mackinac Center
Coca-Cola crisis exposes conflicts in Trump agenda| Mackinac Center
Richard Vedder discusses his book on creative destruction in higher education| Mackinac Center
Opportunities for Michigan as Trump moves to fulfill Reagan-era abolition promise| Mackinac Center
Top 10 cringe (and criminal) moments from the Michigan Economic Development Corporation| Mackinac Center
You don’t need a press pass to keep an eye on state agencies| Mackinac Center
Michigan should reform the federal 340B program| Mackinac Center
Courts, unions, state governments must respect Janus decision| Mackinac Center
Lawmakers should limit their next spending hike to 3.6%| Mackinac Center
Union Township needs broad policy and management reform, not subsidies for graduates| Mackinac Center
Every policy idea has tradeoffs| Mackinac Center
Twelve reasons corporate welfare doesn’t lead to prosperity| Mackinac Center
Fancy innovations have failed to improve student performance| Mackinac Center
Stephen Henderson and Nolan Finley urge Americans to embrace civil disagreement, not avoid it| Mackinac Center
Talk and tax-hike requests don’t fill potholes| Mackinac Center
House bill would return spending decisions to local school districts| Mackinac Center
Mackinac Center sues to rein in costly and unconstitutional earmark process.| Mackinac Center
Returning to fundamental principles is the best way to celebrate America| Mackinac Center
‘Fair Share Surcharge’ would crush economic activity without helping schools| Mackinac Center
Goals matter more than processes| Mackinac Center
Lawmakers have approved billions for pet projects in recent years| Mackinac Center
(Mackinac Center President Lawrence W. Reed gave the | Mackinac Center
Economic development programs are political development programs| Mackinac Center
Government officials make the perfect the enemy of the good| Mackinac Center
State development agency’s job-creation record is embarrassing| Mackinac Center
Taxpayers lose with poorly designed site preparation program| Mackinac Center
Discouraging supply is not the way to make housing more affordable| Mackinac Center
Why then risk hundreds of millions more for industry subsidies with a failed track record?| Mackinac Center
Joseph Overton observed that in a given public policy area, such as education, only a relatively narrow range of potential policies will be considered politically acceptable. This "window" of politically acceptable options is primarily defined not by what politicians prefer, but rather by what they believe they can support and still win re-election.| Mackinac Center
