In PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas, Nevada Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe, citing “repeated misrepresentations” from Counter-Defendant Daniel Simic and stating that “Mintas has made a strong showing of discovery misconduct”, granted Mintas’ motion for a forensic examination. The post Repeated Misrepresentations Lead to Order for Forensic Examination: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.
