My exact problem with them, besides their inherent academic masturbation in a circle jerk reaction, is their idea that all aces must be alike and fit the majority when Aces often contradict them, but then the aces that contradict them aren’t considered “reliable sources” only they are, quoting themselves. The idea of a biological imperative for all of sexuality, in of itself is problematic. If there is a biological element, it’s not locked into ideas of things like religion or height...
