Just 14% of employees believe their performance reviews catalyze improvement. One-third of the time, they do more harm than good, says Gallup. This signifies a real need to upgrade the performance review process. Quarterly reviews are one highly effective way to change the review experience, and still benefit from the insights that performance reviews provide. A quarterly performance review is a great compromise. It’s a happy medium between annual reviews, and no reviews. Continue reading Q...| Primalogik
Today, it’s a common practice to hold a mid-year review in addition to a year-end review. For hybrid and remote teams, this is especially important since managers may have less chance to observe employees directly. Holding a one-on-one assessment meeting is one thing – making the most of the process is another. By being prepared and using the right tools, anyone can learn to hold an effective and fruitful mid-year review. Keep reading to learn how in this complete guide to mid-year review...| Primalogik
In a typical performance evaluation, the manager reviews the employee. But in a supervisor evaluation, the opposite takes place. A supervisor evaluation by employees shows managers how to improve. Doing them regularly will give managers vital insights into their performance. Why is this important? Supervisors need to continuously work on their professional development, just like any employee. According to SHRM, half of all employees feel their own performance would improve if their manager...| Primalogik
One-on-one meetings are a key component of performance management. Holding them regularly—ideally, once a week, or at least once every two weeks—is key to helping employees harness their strengths. According to Gallup, 80% of employees who have received meaningful feedback in the past week are fully engaged at work. Regular check-ins also play a pivotal role in building trust between managers and employees. In its research, Google found that managers with high ratings are more like...| Primalogik