A leading molecular geneticist explains how his research challenges claims that GMOs are “substantially equivalent” to non-GMOs — the foundation of U.S. regulations for GMOs — and how regulators are ignoring modern scientific tests and methods that can help us better understand health risks of GMOs and pesticides. The post Not substantially equivalent: New scientific methods challenge claims that GMOs are safe (Professor Antoniou interview part 2) appeared first on U.S. Right to Know.
